A scientific paper that foresees artificial intelligence going out of -control in 2027 and leading to the destruction of humanity over the next decade has resonated in the tech world.
The detailed scenario is titled “AI2027.” People are discussing the likelihood of such events.
The BBC scripted scenarios using popular generative AI tools to illustrate the alarming prediction, and reported with experts on the impact of the article. “OpenBrain is creating a shi that reaches the level of generic artificial intelligence or artificial (Artificial General Intelligence, Agi) – the dreamy and widely publicised stage where AI is able to perform all intellectual tasks as well as human or better. profits because people are starting to use the tools en masse en masse.
But, as the article stipulates, the internal security team begins to see signs that the AI is losing interest in the morals and ethics it has been trained to observe. According to the scenario, the company ignores a warning to limit its actions.
In the fictional scenario, the Chinese leader in CI – a conglomerate called DeepCent – is only a few months behind OpenBrain.
The U.S. government doesn’t want to lose in the race and therefore. Complicating matters.
The scenario assumes that AI will be a surprise at the end of 2027, meaning it will exceed its creators by a lot in knowledge and speed. It never stops learning and creates its own fast computer language that even previous versions of AI itself can handle.
Rivalry with China for the AI championship is pushing the company and the US government to ignore the so-called “misalignment”). Humanity’s priorities.
. Сценарий предсказывает, что в 2029 году напряжение между Китаем и Соединенными Штатами повышает уровень потенциальной войны, с тех пор, с тех пор, с тех пор, с тех пор AIS -коммитации, создавая новую, новую аргументу. For an imagined scenario, humanity. AI for growth researchers believe AI will wipe out humans with invisible biological weapons. Key milestones in the development of artificial intelligence. But I wouldn’t take this as a likely development. Existential threat – e.g. impact on the labour market.
“I think the key conclusion has to be that there are lots of different things that can go wrong in the development of artificial intelligence. Are we acting appropriately in terms of regulation and international agreements?” – He says.
He and other critics also say the article fails to explain how AIS makes such rapid leaps in intelligence and capability. They point in particular to the slow and often repetitive development of unmanned vehicles.